<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel>
<title>Blog | Michael Engel</title>
<link>https://blog.ing-engel.org/en/blog/</link>
<description>Engineering services (RA &amp; AI)</description>
<language>en</language>
<item><title>AI Act for medical devices delayed to August 2028: more time, same work</title><link>https://blog.ing-engel.org/en/blog/ai-act-medical-devices-2028/</link><guid>https://blog.ing-engel.org/en/blog/ai-act-medical-devices-2028/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>The Digital Omnibus pushes the high-risk obligations for AI in medical devices back by a year. Notified bodies warn of a bottleneck.</description></item>
<item><title>AI in regulatory work: grounded in sources, not a text generator</title><link>https://blog.ing-engel.org/en/blog/ai-in-ra-work-source-grounding/</link><guid>https://blog.ing-engel.org/en/blog/ai-in-ra-work-source-grounding/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Two research papers show how AI can support safety documentation and classification without sacrificing traceability. Still at concept stage, but a useful principle.</description></item>
<item><title>Generative AI medical devices: FDA asks for feedback by 19 October</title><link>https://blog.ing-engel.org/en/blog/fda-generative-ai-devices-discussion-paper/</link><guid>https://blog.ing-engel.org/en/blog/fda-generative-ai-devices-discussion-paper/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>FDA outlines a competency-based assessment for medical devices that use generative AI. Not a requirement yet, but a clear signal of what manufacturers should prepare for.</description></item>
<item><title>FDA: radiology AI still needs a 510(k), including follow-on devices</title><link>https://blog.ing-engel.org/en/blog/fda-radiology-ai-510k/</link><guid>https://blog.ing-engel.org/en/blog/fda-radiology-ai-510k/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>FDA has denied a partial exemption for radiology CAD and triage software. What manufacturers should now build into their submission planning.</description></item>
<item><title>New standards for AI: EN 18286 and ISO/TS 24971-2 are out, presumption of conformity is not</title><link>https://blog.ing-engel.org/en/blog/standards-ai-qms-risk-management/</link><guid>https://blog.ing-engel.org/en/blog/standards-ai-qms-risk-management/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>A European QMS standard for the AI Act and an ISO guide to risk management for machine learning. What they cover and where the gap remains.</description></item>
</channel></rss>
